An Israeli View of the Anti-Zionist Left
Kenan: The war in Vietnam is approaching its conclusion and the "New Left" is looking for another horse to mount. This new horse is Israel.
Kenan: The war in Vietnam is approaching its conclusion and the "New Left" is looking for another horse to mount. This new horse is Israel.
PFLP: The great Swiss tradition of coexistence between different racial and religious groups is precisely what we want to establish in a de-Zionized Palestine.
The Palestine committees were established with the aim of supporting the revolutionary struggle of the Palestinian people against Zionism and Imperialism, with American Imperialism at its head.
The murder in Rafah exposes the true face of the Parliament, of the Government, and of the Zionist regime in general.
Israeli critique of Zionist history and policy, July 1968.
This document, written in January 1968, was submitted for discussion among Matzpen members. An updated and edited version of the article was published in 1972 the book "The Other Israel".
We declare our support of the rights of the Palestinian Arab people, including the right to self-determination and the right to resist occupation by every means that are considered legitimate in any case of occupation.
The debate taking place in Israel about the future of the Occupied Territories concerns inevitably the nature of Israel and the Zionist claim that the Jews have a “right” over the Palestinian territory. Thus the most fundamental principles of Zionism are back on the agenda.
This round in the anti-imperialist struggle can be summed up by saying that while the Israeli people were lined up behind the wrong leadership on the wrong side of the barricade, the Arab people were lined up behind the wrong leadership on the right side of the barricade.
The Palestine problem has two fundamental political aspects: that of re-establishing the rights of the Palestinian Arabs; and that of integrating the Israelis into the political structure of the Middle East. These hard political issues have for years been submerged by nationalism. The Arab nationalist leaders pretend to have a solution to the first aspect; they do not even claim one for the second.
The choice is between an Israeli and Middle Eastern State of Israel, aiming to integrate in its environment — and a Zionist state, a foreign body in this region, a state that is subordinated to the Jewish communities around the world and to the global “power centers” where most Jews are located.
Hebrew nationalism is indeed opposed to Zionism; but it is incapable of confronting Zionism thoroughly and repudiating it radically, root and branch. For the Hebrew nation has come into being as a result of the Zionist colonization of Palestine, and therefore the nationalist outlook, for which this nation is an absolute and supreme value, cannot radically repudiate Zionism, its progenitor. Hebrew nationalism can only claim that Zionism is outdated, no longer suited to present conditions, and Hebrew nationalism ought to be embraced in its place.
A political solution must sooner or later be found, that is both realistic and just. The alternative is ‒ eventually ‒ war, which will at best only defer, not solve, the political problems.
Recognising the right to self-determination of the Kurdish people and establishing an independent Kurdish state would not in any way be detrimental to the Arab liberation movement; on the contrary, an independent Kurdish state in Iraqi Kurdistan could become a centre and lever for the entire Kurdish national movement in Iran and Turkey.