Letters to other Editors

2021-12-22T12:10:36+02:00May 15, 1969|Categories: Articles, ISRACA|Tags: , , , , , , , |

Suggestions for dispersing women's demonstrations with tear-gas; The problem of the Arab refugees; Like Rhodesia?; An interview with a leader of Al Fatah; Demonstrations by women in the occupied territories; Not only Jews were hung in Iraq; From Cuba to the editor of the Israel imperial News; Don't withdraw from Sinai; Democracy in Israel?

Resurrection of the Dead ‒ Moshe Machover

2016-01-02T14:35:41+02:00October 10, 1967|Categories: Articles|Tags: |

The debate taking place in Israel about the future of the Occupied Territories concerns inevitably the nature of Israel and the Zionist claim that the Jews have a “right” over the Palestinian territory. Thus the most fundamental principles of Zionism are back on the agenda.

New Premises for a False Conclusion ‒ Moshe Machover

2021-06-05T13:14:11+03:00May 10, 1967|Categories: Articles|Tags: |

The choice is between an Israeli and Middle Eastern State of Israel, aiming to integrate in its environment — and a Zionist state, a foreign body in this region, a state that is subordinated to the Jewish communities around the world and to the global “power centers” where most Jews are located.

The Social Identity of Ha’olam Hazeh — Moshe Machover

2015-09-02T17:49:33+03:00January 10, 1967|Categories: Articles|Tags: |

Hebrew nationalism is indeed opposed to Zionism; but it is incapable of confronting Zionism thoroughly and repudiating it radically, root and branch. For the Hebrew nation has come into being as a result of the Zionist colonization of Palestine, and therefore the nationalist outlook, for which this nation is an absolute and supreme value, cannot radically repudiate Zionism, its progenitor. Hebrew nationalism can only claim that Zionism is outdated, no longer suited to present conditions, and Hebrew nationalism ought to be embraced in its place.

Go to Top